Sheikh Yunus Kamoga, 5 others set free by Court of Appeal on terrorism charges

0
500
Sheikh Yunus Kamoga at Court recently ; File Photo.

Former Tabliq Sect leader, Amir Umar Mohammed Yunus Kamoga and 5 others who had been sentenced to life and 30 years imprisonment respectively in August 2017, are now free men after the Court of Appeal overturned their conviction for lack of evidence to incriminate them.

The six and others were convicted for verbal terrorism that allegedly led to the death of two Muslim Clerics Mustafa Bahiga and Hassan Kirya, and the attempted murder of Sheikh Haruna Jjemba.

Three Justices of the Court of Appeal led by now Chief Justice Alfonse Owiny Dollo ruled that the prosecution had not proved this case beyond reasonable doubt because acts of terrorism must have an ingredient of indiscriminateness which they have not found in this case.

Kamoga was jointly convicted with Sheikh Siraje Kawooya, Sheikh Murta Mudde Bukenya, Fahad Kalungi, Yusuf Kakande and Abdul Salam Sekayanja.

The Justices also observed that none of the prosecution witnesses presented in the High court attended the meetings where the alleged convicts staged the crimes they were accused of, and neither do the fliers that had the targeted names convey any message of murder or any intent of terrorism.

The court sentenced Sheikhs; Kamoga, Kawooya, Bukenya and Kalungi to life imprisonment while Kakande and Sekayanja were to spend thirty years in prison.

The group was part of 14 men accused of murdering Sheikh Mustafa Bahiga and Ibrahim Hassan Kirya and attempted murder of Sheikh Haruna Jjemba.

Three Judges of the Lower court of the International Crimes Division had held that under the terrorism charge, the convicts indiscriminately terrorized and maimed Sheikh Haruna Jjemba, Najib Ssonko, Bahiga, Umar Swadiq, Kirya, Mahmood Kibaate and Prince Kassim Nakibinge.

Court of Appeal Deputy Registrar Mary Babirye delivered the court ruling of behalf of their Lordships.

Defense Lawyers and relatives to the freed Muslims welcomed the court ruling and said they will wait for instructions from their clients on whether to sue the state for malicious prosecution.

<

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here